No edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
I don't think it's fair to level accusations about unrelated subpaths in a subpath description. I'm changing the statements to something more neutral, but I think the comparison should be removed entirely. Ideally, we should opt for the NPOV that most Wikis try for. | I don't think it's fair to level accusations about unrelated subpaths in a subpath description. I'm changing the statements to something more neutral, but I think the comparison should be removed entirely. Ideally, we should opt for the NPOV that most Wikis try for. | ||
[[User:Scribble|Scribble]] 9:19, 19 Sept 2005 (EST) | |||
Revision as of 17:18, 19 September 2005
I thought it was best to seperate the details of the Shadow subpath from the events surrounding the actual disbanding. The disbandment can now be found under Shadow disbandment. --Zaventh 10:09, 25 Aug 2005 (EDT)
I don't think it's fair to level accusations about unrelated subpaths in a subpath description. I'm changing the statements to something more neutral, but I think the comparison should be removed entirely. Ideally, we should opt for the NPOV that most Wikis try for.
Scribble 9:19, 19 Sept 2005 (EST)