Talk:Vortex Items: Difference between revisions

Discussion page of Vortex Items
No edit summary
Line 9: Line 9:


?
?
=== re: might be able to help ===
Yeah, I had thought about that possibility. If you wanted to do it, just put a highly visible disclaimer on the item page saying the stats are good estimates. Also, a table layout like that would be ideal. I didn't spend a lot of time on the layout as I was most concerned with getting the stats up first. --[[User:Zaventh|Zaventh]] 07:53, 22 Feb 2006 (EST)

Revision as of 04:53, 22 February 2006

Please verify information if possible! I just keyed these in all at one time so there may be a few typos. A few I didn't have stats for... fill these in if possible! --Zaventh 16:21, 21 Feb 2006 (EST)

might be able to help

Zav, I have estimated stats for the missing ones basically extrapiliated from what was known, I could add them as best guess info, not perfect but probbaly better than no info :/. I cant confirm this but I think the Ancient hand item Prot and healings are off, unless Kru was real mean and zero'd them all, Ill try and confirm from in game, wether thats the case. Also would the page be better layed out in a table

New || Worn || Old || Ancient

?

re: might be able to help

Yeah, I had thought about that possibility. If you wanted to do it, just put a highly visible disclaimer on the item page saying the stats are good estimates. Also, a table layout like that would be ideal. I didn't spend a lot of time on the layout as I was most concerned with getting the stats up first. --Zaventh 07:53, 22 Feb 2006 (EST)