(Aiee) |
m (Reverted edit of Amaze, changed back to last version by Zaventh) |
||
| (8 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
--[[User:Calhon|Calhon]] 11:28, 9 Aug 2005 (EDT) | --[[User:Calhon|Calhon]] 11:28, 9 Aug 2005 (EDT) | ||
== New layout? == | |||
Would this layout be more straightforward and a bit more logically organized? | |||
I think it is best because of a few reasons. One it is easy to find what you are looking for. Also, it is fairly consolidated but not all crammed onto one page. The most important thing is that each items still gets its own namespace [[Sonhi pipe]] for instance AND we can also have info for types of items (ie. [[Pipes]] which will bring up [[Sonhi pipe]] which will give you even more details]]. This can be useful when referring not to any specific item but rather groups of items. Example: An entry about Carnages might include the phrase: '''"Be sure to bring a bunch of [[Pipes]] with you"''' which would then link the reader to lots of pipes, instead of saying: '''"Be sure to bring some [[Herb pipe]]s with you"''' which gives you only information about Herb pipes. | |||
== RE: New Layout == | |||
Hey, | |||
it really looks good. I think it's a good entrance to the item section. What it also could use is a way to search for items because sometimes you're trying to find info on items you have no idea what they are. | |||
Anyways, it looks good. | |||
LordChrono | |||
== Searching for items == | |||
Just use the search box just below the nav menu on every page. ;) --[[User:Zaventh|Zaventh]] 21:09, 10 Aug 2005 (EDT) | |||
Latest revision as of 13:48, 14 August 2005
Conceptual Edit
I am trying to take the item listings into a more clear and concise format. Once we get a large listing of actual items we will need to start using tables to hold the item names.--Zaventh 14:05, 29 Jul 2005 (EDT)
Revamp
This page needs to be reorganized. I am thinking making it four simple links (one for each page) that get more specific page by page. --Zaventh 16:01, 8 Aug 2005 (EDT)
Aiee
Theres wayyy to many items to add to this page! :p
What to do what to do..
--Calhon 11:28, 9 Aug 2005 (EDT)
New layout?
Would this layout be more straightforward and a bit more logically organized?
I think it is best because of a few reasons. One it is easy to find what you are looking for. Also, it is fairly consolidated but not all crammed onto one page. The most important thing is that each items still gets its own namespace Sonhi pipe for instance AND we can also have info for types of items (ie. Pipes which will bring up Sonhi pipe which will give you even more details]]. This can be useful when referring not to any specific item but rather groups of items. Example: An entry about Carnages might include the phrase: "Be sure to bring a bunch of Pipes with you" which would then link the reader to lots of pipes, instead of saying: "Be sure to bring some Herb pipes with you" which gives you only information about Herb pipes.
RE: New Layout
Hey, it really looks good. I think it's a good entrance to the item section. What it also could use is a way to search for items because sometimes you're trying to find info on items you have no idea what they are.
Anyways, it looks good. LordChrono
Searching for items
Just use the search box just below the nav menu on every page. ;) --Zaventh 21:09, 10 Aug 2005 (EDT)